Why Twitter says it banned President Trump – ClearTips

Why Twitter says it banned President Trump – TechCrunch

Twitter Taking a dramatic step to limit Trump’s ability to communicate with his followers, the US president on Friday permanently banned him. The decision, made in light of his impetus for Wednesday’s violent invasion of the US Capitol, may not seem particularly familiar to anyone with his Twitter presence.

In fact, Twitter gave Trump many, many second chances in his four years as president, putting him on stage because of the company’s belief that speech by world leaders is in the public interest, even if it breaks the rules .

Now that Trump has left for good, we have a very interesting glimpse into the policy decision that brought Twitter down the hammer on Friday. The company first announced Trump’s ban A series of tweets from its @TwitterSafety account but Linked to a blog post detailing your thinking.

In that deep dive, the company reveals that it gave Trump one last chance after being suspended and then reinstated his account for the breach on Wednesday. But the next day, a pair of tweets made by the president pushed him in line. Twitter said those tweets written below were not investigated on a standalone basis, but rather in reference to their recent behavior and the events of this week.

“… We have determined that these tweets are in violation of the glorification of the violence policy and that user @realDonaldTrump should immediately be permanently suspended from service,” Twitter wrote.

Screenshot via twitter

The company is as follows Its logic:

  • “President Trump’s statement that he will not attend the inauguration is being confirmed by many of his supporters that the election was not valid and saw him rejecting his previous claim made via two tweets (1, 2) The deputy chief of staff, Dan Scavino, said that there would be an ‘orderly transition’ on 20 January.
  • “The second tweet may also serve as an encouragement to those contemplating violent acts that the inauguration would be a ‘safe’ target, as it would not participate.”
  • The use of the words “Pat American Patriots” to describe some of his supporters is also being interpreted as support for violent acts in the US Capitol.
  • “Their supporters mention ANT to be longer in the future” and that they will not be disrespected or misbehaved in any way, shape or form !!! This is further interpreted as an indication that President Trump does not plan to facilitate a ‘gradual transition’ and instead plans to support, empower and shield those who win elections.
  • “Plans for future armed protests have already started campaigning on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state Capitol buildings on 17 January 2021.”

This is all very intuitive, though his most ardent supporters are unlikely to agree. Ultimately these decisions, as much as they come for the stated policies, involve much subjective analysis and interpretation. As social media companies try out algorithms that can make tough calls for them, the buck stops with a group of humans trying to figure out the best course of action.

Twitter’s explanation provides a completely transparent glimpse into how social networks decide and what goes on. This is a big step for Twitter – one that many believe should have been months if not years ago – and it’s useful to see what can happen in what is often an abusive high-level decision-making process Be seen clearly and publicly for all.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*