A new UK public body, which will be tasked to help the digital sector’s most powerful companies ensure online competition, and consumers of digital services have more choices and control over their data has begun today.
The Digital Market Unit (DMU), which was announced in November last year – after several market reviews and studies examining concerns about the concentration of digital market power – does not yet possess statutory powers, but The government has said that it will consult on the legislation to design and put in place a new “pro-contest regime” this year. DMU As soon as parliamentary time permits, at the statutory level.
Facebook and Google are important drivers for regulatory growth regarding the market strength of MediaTek giants.
As a first job, the unit will look at how codes of conduct can operate to drive the relationship between digital businesses and small businesses such as third parties that advertise or use their services to reach customers. Rely on – to feed into the digital law of the future.
The role of the powerful intermediary online gatekeepers is also being targeted by EU lawmakers, who proposed legislation at the end of last year that aims to create a regulatory framework that promotes fair dealing between platform veterans and small businesses. Could ensure their conditions.
The UK government said today that the DMU would adopt a sector neutral approach to examine the role of platforms in a range of digital markets with the aim of promoting competition.
The entity has been asked to work with Comms watchdog Ofcom, which the government named last year as its pick to regulate social media platforms under planned legislation, because this year (aka, online security Bill to be introduced as it is now called).
However, the upcoming legislation aims to regulate a lot of online hormones that can affect consumers – ranging from bullying and hate speech to child sexual abuse and other speech-related issues (lots of controversy, and implications for privacy Specific concerns about). Security) – The DMU’s focus is on business influences and consumer controls that may have implications for competition in digital markets.
As part of its first action program, the government said that the Secretary of State for Digital has asked DMU to work with Comcom to specifically look at a code that links between news publishers such as platforms and content providers How to control – “including making sure they are as fair and reasonable as possible”, as its press release stated.
It suggests that the DMU will take a view on recently passed legislation in Australia, which makes it mandatory for platforms to negotiate with news publishers to pay for the reuse of their content.
Earlier this year, the head of the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), which would sit within the DMU, told the BBC that if commercial negotiations between tech giants and publishers failed, Australia would be forced to backstop compulsory arbitration. The view of being is a “sensible” one. “the vision.
DMU will also work closely with CMA’s Enforcement Division – which currently holds a number of open investigations of tech giants, including considering complaints against Apple and Google; And an in-depth investigation of Facebook’s Giphy takeover.
Other UK regulators say the DMU will work closely with the inclusion of the Data Protection Watchdog (ICO) and the Financial Conduct Authority.
It also said that the entity will also coordinate with international partners, given the digital competition is an issue that is inherently global in nature – adding that it is already through bilateral engagement with its approach and its G. 7 is in discussion as part of the Presidency.
“The Digital Secretary will host a meeting of digital and technical ministers in April as it strives to build consensus for better information sharing and coordination to engage in regulatory and policy approaches.”
The DMU will be led by Will Hatter, who will take up an interim head position in early May after a stint in the Cabinet Office working on the Brexit transition policy. Prior to this he worked at CMU for many years and also, among other roles in regulatory policy, Seacom and Com.