The RIAA is coming for the YouTube downloaders – ClearTips

The RIAA is coming for the YouTube downloaders – TechCrunch

In the old days of piracy, the RIAA takedown notice was a common thing – I got something myself. But that has fallen as most pirate tracking has become more difficult. But the RIAA may still release nastygrams – for software creators The potential Like YouTube downloaders are used to infringe copyright.

One such popular tool used by many developers, YouTube-DL, is currently removed from GitHub following threats from the RIAA, as noted by Parker Higgins’ Freedom of the Press Foundation. earlier today.

This is a different kind of takedown notice, which we all remember from the early 2000s. They were numerous DMCA notices stating that “your website is hosting such-and-protected content, please take it down.” And they still exist, but a lot of them have been automated, removing sites that violate videos like YouTube before they become public.

What the RIAA has done here is that YouTube -DL should be taken down because it violates Section 1201 of US copyright law, which basically bans goods found around DRM. “No person shall circumvent a technical measure that effectively controls access to protected work under this title.”

Not so, it is illegal to distribute, say, a Blu-ray disc, but rather to break its security and duplicate it in the first place.

If you extend that logic a bit, you end up with things like YouTube-DL, a command-line tool that takes in a YouTube URL and points the user to raw video and audio, which of course Has to be stored from a server somewhere. The location of the file that would normally be streamed in the YouTube web player, the user can download a video for offline use or backup.

But what if someone uses that tool to download the official music video for Taylor Swift’s “Shake It Off”? Shock! Horror! theft! YouTube-DL enables this, so it should be taken down, they write.

As always, it only takes some time to get into the analog (or analog) conditions that the RIAA has given for a long time. For example, wouldn’t using a screen and audio capture utility accomplish the same thing? What about a camcorder? Or a cassette recorder, for that matter? They all use DR to “surround” Tai’s videos by making an offline copy without the rights-holder’s permission.

Naturally this will do almost nothing to stop the takedown software, which was probably downloaded and prevented from being used or updated thousands of times already. There are dozens of sites and apps that do this – and by reasoning in this paper the RIAA may very well take action against them.

Of course, the RIAA is bound by the duty to protect against infringement, and one cannot expect it to stand idly by, as people scour official YouTube accounts to obtain high-quality bootlegs from artists’ entire discographies We do. But going after basic instruments is like the old, ineffective “home tapping is killing the music industry” line. Nobody is buying it. And if we’re going to talk about the wholesale theft of artists, perhaps the RIAA should have found its home already – streaming services are paying the money with the association’s blessing. (Buy stuff at Bandcamp instead.)

Tools such as YouTube-DL are technologies such as cassette tapes, cameras, and hammers that can be used legally or illegally. Fair use principles allow tools for such trustworthy efforts, such as archived content that may be lost because Google stops caring, or for people who for one reason or another have a broader look Want a local copy of available from, free piece of media for personal use.

YouTube and other platforms, likewise, are in harmony, which they can make clear and large-scale infringement difficult. There is no “download” button next to the latest Top 40 hits, but there are links to purchase it, and if I used a copy – even the one I bought – the background to my own video As for, I wouldn’t even be able to put it on YouTube in the first place.

Temporarily deleting YouTube-DL’s code from GitHub is a short-sighted response to a problem that might not amount to more than a rounding error in the scheme of things. They probably lose more money to people who share logins. This or that is something that it will be back soon, a little smarter and a little better, making the RIAA’s job much harder, and repeating the cycle.

Maybe the makers of Whack-a-Mole will sue the RIAA for infringement what is ours Unique ip.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*