Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan respond to Chan Zuckerberg Initiative scientists’ open letter on Trump – TipsClear

Mark Zuckberg and Priscilla Chan Last week has responded to an open letter sent by a group of more than 140 scientists who are working on projects funded by the Chan Zuckerberg initiative. The letter below as a whole expresses concern over how Facebook manages misinformation and harmful, offensive, and discriminatory language towards specific groups of people – and especially Trump’s own offensive, racist and dangerous Around treatment.

Chan and Zuckerberg’s response thanked the scientists for expressing their concerns, and specifically stated that both are “individually” […] Deeply shaken and disgusted by President Trump’s divisive and rude rhetoric, “and also acknowledges that despite the CZI and Facebook Existing as completely separate entities, they clearly share a common leader in Zuckerberg.

This paper points to some recent blog posts and resources that Facebook has published about its chosen status, as well as what it is doing to review its current policies around its products as they Related to racial issues and social justice.

The response from CZI’s top leaders states that Facebook’s policies are not its own, and suggests that while defining its perspective, it will commit to doing more to address racial inequalities and injustice.

In the end, Chan and Zuckerberg’s letter does not contain much substance, and if any thing really re-emphasizes the problem at the core of the letter from the scientists concerned, to begin with. It notes the paradox of how entities differ in terms of the elements of their guiding principles led by an ordinary person, but does not directly address the main question for scientists, which is that Zuckerberg is his position on Facebook We use to wield that platform’s power for greater social well-being, not that the CZI necessarily changes its behavior.

This is bound to become a recurring strain for CZI and Facebook, with each seeing relative posts and participants. It is unlikely that such responses will do much to address any long-term concerns from CZI researchers and academics.

Related Posts