Facebook’s Content Oversight Board plans to rule on Wednesday whether Donald Trump will be able to use the platform that was booted because of concerns from the former president that could provoke violence like January 6.. The board tweeted its plans on Monday morning.
The case is highly viewed as it underscores how private social media companies handle political speeches by public figures. In January, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made the unprecedented decision to ban Trump as he killed supporters as Congress gathered to authenticate the election of Joe Biden as president. The risks of Trump being allowed to continue posting were “simply too great,” the Facebook boss at the time said.
Other social media networks, including Snapchat and Google-owned YouTube, have taken action against Trump to varying degrees. Twitter has permanently banned Trump from his platform.
The Oversight Board’s review, which Facebook requested, follows the board’s decisions on its first slate of cases, including hate speech, inciting violence and other thorny topics. The board is funded by Facebook but has been described as independent.
Read more: Here’s how you canFor Facebook’s new Board of Inspection.
A critic of Facebook, which was used by Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election, says it is not taking its responsibility seriously and does not think the oversight board moves fast enough or too much Goes away. A group of outspoken critics have set up a shadow organization, which he calls the Real Facebook Oversight Board.
The group is urging Facebook’s monitoring board to ban Trump. The group said in a post on Monday that Trump should be “forever banned” for violating social network rules on hate speech and spreading disinformation. But the group also referred to the forthcoming decision as a public relations “stunt”, which means a defense against the loss of social networks.
Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Here is all you need to know about Facebook’s Oversight Board:
Seems like this board will have a lot of responsibility. what can it do?
Let’s do something straight: Oversight board does not work the same way as content moderators, who decide if individual posts on Facebook follow social network rules. The board exists to support Facebook’s “right to free expression” of 2.85 billion users.
The board acts very much like a courtroom, which is not surprising that a Harvard law professor came up with the idea. Users who assume content intermediaries have removed their posts improperly may appeal to the board for a second opinion. If the board sides with the user, Facebook must restore the post. Facebook can also refer cases to the board.
The Oversight Board may also suggest changes to Facebook’s policies. Over time, those recommendations can affect what users are allowed to post, which can make content moderation easier.
Why does Facebook need an oversight board in the first place?
Facebook is criticized for making just about every decision about everyone. Patrons say the company – and the rest of Silicon Valley – is biased against their views. They point to the right-wing provocate Alex Alex Jones and the ban of Milano Yiannopoulos to support their case.
Social networks don’t get much love from progressivists, either. He complains that Facebook has become a venomous bog of racist, sexist and misleading speech. In July, some progressive groups outlined their concerns by calling companies not advertising on Facebook and promoting the boycott with the hashtag #StopHateForProfit.
The Oversight Board can help deal with those complaints, while looking at the credibility of the social network’s community standards, a code of conduct that prohibits hate speech, child nudity and a host of other offensive content. By giving an independent board guide decision about this content, Facebook hopes to develop a more consistent application of its rules, which have generated complaints for appearing arbitrary in the past.
An example: Facebook’s removal of an iconic Vietnam War photo in 2016 that shows a naked girl fleeing a napalm attack. The company defended the expulsion, saying the Pulitzer Prize-winning image violated its rules on child nudity. It overturned its decision as global criticism increased.
Understood. But why does Facebook need an independent organization?
It is no secret that Facebook has a trust problem. Regulators, politicians and the public all question whether the company serves its users or not. Facebook should be made independent of the board, giving credence to the company, convincing people that its decisions are being made not on the basis of the interests of the company, but on the merits of the situation.
Okay. So who has chosen Facebook to be on this board?
Last year, Facebook named the first 20 members of the board, a lineup that includes former judges and current lawyers, as well as professors and journalists. It also includes a former Prime Minister and a Nobel Peace Prize winner. The board could eventually be expanded to 40 people.
The social network chose a diverse group. Members have lived in about 30 countries and speak many languages. About a quarter come from the US and Canada.
At the time of the announcement, Hale Thoring-Schmidt, who served as Danish Prime Minister from 2011 to 2015, said that one of the biggest advantages of the board would be removing some content-moderation responsibility from Facebook. As it stands, he said, decision making is very centralized.
“Social media can spread speech that is hateful, deceitful, and harmful,” she said. “And so far, some of the most difficult decisions around the content have been made by Facebook, and you can finally say that by Mark Zuckerberg.”
Working on the board is a part-time job, in which members are paid through a multimillion-dollar trust. Board members will serve a three-year term. The board will have the power to select future members. It will hear cases in a panel of five members chosen at random.
According to The New Yorker, Trump and conservatives were unhappy with the makeup of the board, which he saw as too liberal. The former president also called on Zuckerberg to express this sentiment, but Facebook did not change the board members.
Wait a minute. Facebook is paying the board? Is it really free?
If you have doubts, we hear you. Facebook does not have a large reputation for transparency.
That board said, the establishment of the board gives an account of the efforts being made by Facebook to ensure the independence of the board. For example, the board is not a subsidiary of Facebook; It is a separate entity with its own headquarters and staff. It maintains its own website (in 18 languages, if you count US and UK English separately) and your own Twitter account.
Nevertheless, when it comes to money, the board is indirectly funded by Facebook through a trust. Facebook is providing $ 130 million to the trust, which it estimates will cover years of expenses.
Facebook says it will follow the board’s decisions even in cases where it disagrees with a decision. (The social network says the only exception would be decisions that would force it to violate the law, an unforeseen event given the legal background of many board members.)
The board will also try to hold Facebook accountable by publishing an annual report, which will include a review of Facebook’s actions as a result of its decisions.