Apple will pay $113M to settle 34-state ‘batterygate’ lawsuit – ClearTips

Apple will pay $113M to settle 34-state ‘batterygate’ lawsuit – TechCrunch

Apple In 2016, 34 states and the District of Columbia have agreed to pay $ 113 million to settle allegations that it broke consumer protection laws over systematically alleviating widespread iPhone battery problems in 2016 . This is in addition to the half billion that the company already pays consumers. Earlier this year and several other fines worldwide.

As we reported over the years, it was that a new version of iOS was causing older (but not older) iPhones to shut down unexpectedly, and that the “fixing” updates to this problem caused those devices to Demonstration broke. .

Conspiracy-minded people, who we now know are many, suspect it was a deliberate drop of performance to buy a new phone. This was not the case, but Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, who led the multi-level investigation, showed that Apple was quite aware of the scale of the issue and the shortcomings of its solution.

Brnovich and his partner AG allege that Apple has “concealed misinformation and information” about iPhone battery problems and the irreversible negative consequences of an update issued to fix them by various consumer protection laws such as Arizona’s Consumer Fraud Act Violated.

Apple agreed to a $ 113 million settlement, which does not admit any wrongdoing, but to be split between the states they choose. This is not fair, such as € 25 million from French authorities; If Apple was liable for the statutory penalty, which probably has been much higher than the agreed amount to date. The CFA of Arizona provides for $ 10,000 per willful violation, and even a fraction of it would have added very quickly which would have increased the amount of people affected.

In addition to cash settlement, Apple should “provide consumers with true information about iPhone battery health, performance, and power management” in various ways. The company had made changes to this effect years ago, but such settlements include such requirements, so that they simply can’t move around and do it again, although some companies, such as Facebook, anyway She does.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*